Pollak v. Harmon

— On the trial of this action of trespass, brought by appellee against appellants, for levying an attachment against Harmon Bros, on a stock of goods which plaintiff claimed to have purchased from the defendants in attachment, *421both the vendors were sworn, and with other witnesses placed under the rule. The consideration alleged to have been paid was plaintiffs assumption of a debt of Harmon Bros, to Lehman, Durr & Co., for which he had become personally liable as surety, and to secure which he had mortgaged his real estate; also, his obligation to hold Harmon Bros, harmless against the…