Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The record indicates that the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. Accordingly, he has no basis to *790now complain that his sentence was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817). In addition, we decline to reduce it in the interests of justice (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). However, directing restitution was improper under the circumstances of this case and that direction is vacated (see, People v Rowe, 75 NY2d 948, affg 152 AD2d 907). We note that Penal Law § 60.27 has since been amended, effective…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. KazepisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. People v. RoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. RoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API