Legal Opinion

Waldrop v. Pearson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1868PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jefferson. Tried before Hon. Wm. S. Mudd. The facts of this case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtA. J. Walker, C. J.

This suit is brought by the appellant in his individual name alone, upon a promissory note payable to himself, “ and David Pearson, administrators of the estate of David Pearson, deceased.” Waldrop, (the appellant,) and David Pearson, one of the appellees, were joint administrators of the estate of David Pearson, deceased, having given a joint administration bond. The note, which is the cause of action, was given in consideration of the purchase of land of the decedent’s estate. Waldrop appears to have acted in most respects as if he had been sole administrator. He alone petitioned for the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Childress v. ChildressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  2. Blann v. CrocheronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  3. Mauldin, Montague & Co. v. ArmisteadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  4. Moseley v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  5. Spivey v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rather v. Young's Adm'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Leach v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Harwood v. HarperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Dunlap v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API