Legal Opinion

In Re Petition of Novotny

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1925No. 17,763PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

In July, 1913, the petitioner was removed from his office of attorney at law. State Board of Law Examiners v. Novotny, 122 Minn. 490, 142 N. W. 733. In 1924, he presented a petition to have the judgment of disbarment set aside and to be reinstated as a member of the bar of this state. The petition was referred to the board of law examiners to investigate and report. That board made an extended investigation and reported the facts ascertained, together with the evidence submitted to it, and made an adverse recommendation.

We have carefully examined the evidence presented in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Board of Law Examiners v. NovotnySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. NovotnyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API