Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

B.F.G. v. C.N.L.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 11, 2016No. 2140771Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMoore, Judge

I concur in the main opinion to the extent it determines that the Houston Circuit Court (“the trial court”) had subject-matter jurisdiction over the civil action filed by B.F.G. (“the father”). I respectfully dissent from the main opinion’s affir-mance of the judgment of the trial court.

*407In its final judgment, the trial court addressed visitation as follows:

“The Court has considered the father’s request for a visitation order but finds that court-ordered visitation is neither practical nor in the child’s best interest at this time. The evidence presented at trial established that the father…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pratt v. PrattCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. L.L.M. v. S.F.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. K.L.U. v. M.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  4. C.W.S. v. C.M.P.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  5. K.L.R. v. L.C.R.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API