B.F.G. v. C.N.L.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMoore, Judge
I concur in the main opinion to the extent it determines that the Houston Circuit Court (“the trial court”) had subject-matter jurisdiction over the civil action filed by B.F.G. (“the father”). I respectfully dissent from the main opinion’s affir-mance of the judgment of the trial court.
*407In its final judgment, the trial court addressed visitation as follows:
“The Court has considered the father’s request for a visitation order but finds that court-ordered visitation is neither practical nor in the child’s best interest at this time. The evidence presented at trial established that the father…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pratt v. PrattCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- L.L.M. v. S.F.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- K.L.U. v. M.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- C.W.S. v. C.M.P.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- K.L.R. v. L.C.R.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.