Legal Opinion

Clarks v. Staring

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1849PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the taxation by the clerk of the costs of the plaintiff at the late Oneida circuit, on the post ponement of the trial of the cause.

1Opinion of the Court

Gridley, Justice.

Two questions arise on this appeal. The first respects the allowance of the travelling fees of the witness Jerrolman, from the city of Hew York to the place of trial and returning after the close of the circuit. The permanent residence of the witness was in Whitestown, in the county of Oneida. He, however, went to the city of Hew York, on business, about one month before the circuit, and he was engaged in business there for about two months afterwards. He was subpoenaed in Hew York city, and came to the court solely in obedience to the snbpoena, and returned to the city…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Booth v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1830

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. HuttonNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Smith v. HuttonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API