Legal Opinion

Hill v. Callaghan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1875PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, Ch. J.

The defendants in error declared on the money counts, and stated under the usual notice, that they would seek to recover upon an instrument described as follows:

“$323.56. Louisville, Ky., Jan. 28, 1873.
“ Sixty (60) days after date pay to the order of ourselves three hundred and twenty-three dollars and fifty-six cents.
“Callaghan & Trigg.
“To Robert E. Hill & Co., Detroit, Mich.
“Accepted, payable at the Merchants and Manufacturers’ Bank.
“Robert E. Hill & Co.”

The plaintiff in error pleaded tbe general issue. On the trial tbe defendants in error, to maintain their action, offered in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. CRAIG v. the State of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Agent of State Prison v. LathropMichigan Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Brown v. LittlefieldNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  4. Dean v. ChapinMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. RothschildMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Gauthier v. ColeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API