Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wimberly v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission of Missouri

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 30, 1985No. 66083Published

1DissentBlackmar, Judge

The principal opinion correctly expounds the purpose of the federal and state unemployment compensation programs in providing a partial wage replacement for workers left unemployed through no fault of their own. The statute denies eligibility to those who voluntarily quit and those who are discharged for misconduct. I believe that Congress, in the 1976 amendments to the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, had the purpose of extending benefits to a woman who becomes pregnant, leaves work as the *351anticipated delivery date appears, and then offers herself for work as soon after giving birth as she is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Turner v. Department of Employment Security of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Staley v. Missouri Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. Bussmann Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Brown v. PorcherDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API