Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. Rouault

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1932No. 3660Published

1Opinion of the CourtBickley, C. J.

This is an action in the' nature of contribution on a lost instrument said to be a promissory note with a warrant of attorney authorizing a confession of judgment. The alleged contents of the instrument sued upon are set forth in the complaint. The payee is the Union Bank, Las Cruces, N. M. — the makers, R. B. Herndon, T. Rouault, and Cecil H. Lockhart.

It is alleged that, after maturity, Herndon and defendant, Lockhart, failed and refused to pay the note, and that plaintiff was compelled to and did pay it, and that he was, at the time suit was commenced, the owner and holder of said note;…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Craighead v. . PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. First National Bank v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Grubbs v. Leon & H. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Kahn v. LesserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Chapin v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API