Rowe v. Chapman Trucking

Because I believe the Commission correctly interpreted section 110 and that interpretation should be given deference by the court, I must respectfully dissent.

The Workers’ Compensation Act embodies a comprehensive scheme to provide compensation to an employee whose work-connected injuries adversely affect the employee’s earning capacity and is a complete *1227substitute for all other private remedies.1 Fanion v. McNeal, 577 A.2d 2, 4 (Me.1990). “The purpose of [the Act] is to provide an effective and expeditious means of compensating injured workers for loss of earning capacity.” Ciccotelli v. KTS…