Legal Opinion
Rudner v. Abbott Laboratories
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 18, 1987No. C84-998-APublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BELL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed this action on March 23, 1984 against defendants for injunctive relief and for treble the damages suffered as a result of defendants’ alleged violations of section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13, and sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2. The court’s subject matter jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1337 and sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15, 26.
The six plaintiffs in this case include an individual and five Ohio corporations engaged in the retail pharmacy…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- J.F. Feeser, Inc. v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- J.F. Feeser, Inc., v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990