Bee Spring Lumber Co. v. Pucossi

WINTERSHEIMER, Justice.

This appeal is from a decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed a judgment in favor of Bee Spring Lumber Company but reversed and remanded to the circuit court for the application of KRS 376.010(4), a dollar-for-dollar credit to a second dwelling owned by the Pucossis.

The issue is whether KRS 376.010(4) or KRS 376.010(3) applies to the mechanics’ lien of $8,282.68 awarded to the lumber company. The question involves whether an interpretation of KRS 376.010 applies to a second or vacation home and whether it is governed by Section (3) or (4) of the statute.

Edward…