Glass v. Cracovaner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Special circumstances have been shown justifying the examination of Dr. Paltauf as a witness. Although an employee of defendant hospital, he was not acting for the hospital in any way connected *780with the death which is the subject of complaint in this action and it would not be in order to examine him under rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice. If plaintiff wishes to examine the doctor, the examination should be sought of him as a witness upon specified necessary and material items. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to further proceedings in accordance with…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Happell v. GenoeseNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Kelser v. Sacramento Telecasters, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960