Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hackley v. Hackley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1986No. 75389, (Calendar No. 12)Published

1Opinion of the Court

426 Mich. 582 (1986)

395 N.W.2d 906

HACKLEY

v.

HACKLEY

Docket No. 75389, (Calendar No. 12).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued March 5, 1986.

Decided November 24, 1986.

Daudert & Basch (by Martin C. Basch) for the plaintiff.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General, James J. Gregart, Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard A. Santoni, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Antoine O'Neal Hackley.

BOYLE, J.

The opinion for reversal excepting this case from the application of res judicata appears to have two bases: (1) the doctrine of res judicata should not preclude the relitigation of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Partmar Corp. v. Paramount Pictures Theatres Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API