Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Williams Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 1960No. Appeal, No. 45Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

Montgomery, J.:

I readily concur not only for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Watkins but for the additional reason that the Bylaws of the Local Union must give way to the Bylaws of the International Union on the point involved. Riverside Lodge No. 164 et al. v. Amalgamated Association of Iron, Steel and Tin Workers of North America et al., 13 F. Supp. 873. The latter gives the right to automatic reinstatement if the International’s monthly assessment is paid within thirty days. The claimant in this case tendered the assessment within that period. Since the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Riverside Lodge No. 164 v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Iron, Steel & Tin Workers of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API