Legal Opinion

State v. Vorburger

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 25, 2001No. 00-0971-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, P.J.

¶ 1. Bradley J. Vorburger appeals from a judgment convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence found after he consented to a search of his car, and after Amerie Becker, his codefendant at trial, consented to a search of their apartment. Vorburger argues that evidence police obtained pursuant to the consent searches should have been suppressed because he and Becker gave consent under conditions constituting an arrest where the police lacked probable cause justifying that arrest. The State argues that the consents were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. State v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. VorburgerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  3. State v. VorburgerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API