Legal Opinion

Smith v. Highland Mary Mining, Milling & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 2, 1927No. 11,573PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Defendant in error had verdict and judgment against plaintiffs in error in a suit based on their entry on its property and their taking therefrom certain personal property, machinery, tools, etc., of the plaintiff, and they bring the case here by writ of error. The court directed a verdict for plaintiff and left to the jury the question of damages only, instructing them to include therein the value of replacing the improvements and the value of the personalty.

The defendants justified their entry by virtue of tax deeds purporting to convey “nine and thirty-two hundredths (9.32) acres of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davidson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  2. Bonfils v. HayesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  3. Rollins v. FearnleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. Weghorst v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  5. Central Realty Co. v. FrostSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Micciche v. BillingsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Battle North, LLC v. Sensible Housing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Carlson v. McNeillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  4. Peters v. Pima Mercantile Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Lake Canal Reservoir Co. v. BeetheSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API