Legal Opinion

Wildearth Guardians v. Bernhardt

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 1, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2020-0056Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, et. al, : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 20-56 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 54, 55, 79, 84 : DEBRA HAALAND, Secretary of the : U.S. Department of the Interior, et. al, : : Defendants, : : and : : AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, : et. al, : : Intervenor-Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS; DENYING AS MOOT AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE’S MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING AS MOOT FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING AS MOOT FEDERAL DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REMAND I.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Teodore Dorotee Autera v. Manuel Dudley Robinson, Anthony C. Autera v. Manuel Dudley RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. Itt Rayonier Incorporated v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API