Legal Opinion

LaFlamme v. Church

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 10, 1983No. 82-284PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought this small claims action seeking to collect $500 allegedly owed him from a previous loan made to defendant. At hearing, defendant acknowledged the $500 loan, but insisted that the loan had been paid back in full in the form of cash and small purchases for plaintiff. The parties were the only witnesses at the hearing, and their testimony was completely conflicting. After hearing, the court found for defendant, and plaintiff filed a timely notice of appeal. We affirm.

We have consistently held that “[w]hen the evidence is conflicting the credibility of the witnesses, the weight…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stamato v. QuazzoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  2. Concra Corp. v. AndrusSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Putnam v. PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. Brouha v. PostmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  3. Eddins v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  4. Cooper v. SavageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  5. Nurenberg v. CoreySupreme Court of Vermont · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API