Legal Opinion

Rohit LNU v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 30, 2026No. 1:26-cv-00016Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROHIT LNU, Case No. 1:26-cv-00016-JLT-SAB-HC 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PETITION FOR WRIT OF 13 v. HABEAS CORPUS IN PART 14 CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner, represented by counsel, is proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 19 I. 20 BACKGROUND 21 Petitioner was born in India and entered the United States on June 20, 2024 and was 22 briefly detained by the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”). Petitioner was…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API