Legal Opinion
Sinett Inc. And Lawrence Bober v. Blairex Laboratories, Inc. And Michael P. Hull
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 2, 1990No. 90-1697PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The defendants in this breach of contract suit have moved-to dismiss the plaintiffs’ appeal on the ground that by failing to make a timely motion, for a new trial the plaintiffs failed to stop the running of the time for filing their notice of appeal. They filed the notice of appeal more than two months after judgment.was entered against them, and this was too late unless the motion for a new trial was timely. It was not. The motion for a new trial must be served, not filed, within ten days of the judgment, Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(b); Sadowski v. Bombardier Ltd., 527 F.2d 1132,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pamela Sue Rulo Sadowski v. Bombardier LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. HolmesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
- Paxton v. WiebeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,475 in the Matter of Schultz Manufacturing Fabricating Company, Debtor. Appeal of Daryl A. Schultz and Norita Schultz. In the Matter of Parr Elevator, Incorporated, Debtor. Appeal of Daryl A. Schultz and Norita Schultz. In the Matter of Daryl A. Schultz and Norita J. Schultz, Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Ortiz-Moss v. New York City Department of TransportationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In re Schultz Manufacturing Fabricating Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.