Legal Opinion

Massie v. Enyart

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

MotioN to vacate supersedeas. Davidson, for the motion.

1Opinion of the Court

Harrison, J.:

The appellants having sued out an execution upon the decree in this court in their favor against the appellees for the cost of the appeal in this case, the appellees filed with the clerk schedules of property they claimed to hold exempt from the execution — one including a homestead, and the clerk thereupon issued a supersedeas as to the property so scheduled.

The appellants, for the cause that the execution is not for-the collection of a debt by contract, have filed a motion to quash the supersedeas. As will be seen by the report of the case — Massie et al. v. Enyart et al, 30…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schouton v. KilmerNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Lathrop v. SingerNew York Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shelby v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Hollis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  3. Edwards v. ThayerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. Reeves v. ReevesCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API