Legal Opinion

Children's Health Defense v. Facebook Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 7, 2021No. 3:20-cv-05787Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE, Case No. 20-cv-05787-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO FILE 9 v. AMICUS BRIEF 10 FACEBOOK INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 89 11 Defendants. 12 13 The Rutherford Institute has filed a motion requesting leave to file an amicus brief. “The 14 || district court has broad discretion to permit amicus briefs.” Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237, 1260 3 15 || (9th Cir. 1982). “There are no strict prerequisites that must be established prior to qualifying for a 16 || amicus status; an individual seeking…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. California by and through Becerrav. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API