Anglo-Chilean Nitrate Sales Corp. v. Alabama
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Cardozo
This case does not present the question that would be here if the appellant had not sought for and obtained a privilege or franchise to do a local business in the state of Alabama. There is nothing in the Alabama decisions, and little in her statutes, to indicate that the tax would have been sustained in the absence of such a grant, or that there would have been even an attempt to levy it. Ewart Lumber Co. v. American Cement Co., 9 Ala. App. 152, 156; 62 So. 560; Citizens National Bank v. Buckheit, 14 Ala. App. 511, 517, 519; 71 So. 82; Tyson v. Jennings Produce Co., 16 Ala. App. 374, 375; 77…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.