Legal Opinion

Rieger v. Fahys Watch-Case Co.

New York City Court

Decided March 23, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from trial term. , Action by John Rieger against the Fahys Watch-Case Company. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Wyck, J.

The plaintiff in his complaint alleges that, while in the employ of defendant, he was engaged in working upon a die and punch machine, where he lost a finger, without any negligence on his part, but through the negligence of defendant in permitting the machine to become defective. He recovered a verdict for six cents. Defendant was allowed to tax costs in ,his own favor, though plaintiff claimed that he should have been allowed costs to the extent of his verdict. Whether the plaintiff or defendant is entitled to costs is the only question before us, and this turns upon whether or not this is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vandenburgh v. TruaxNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Coulter v. . American Merchants' Un. Ex. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Goulet v. . AsselerNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Blin v. CampbellNew York Supreme Court · 1817

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newman v. ChristensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Donner v. GraapWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Donner v. GraapWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Mattes v. PauseNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API