Legal Opinion · Dissent

ClearCorrect Operating, LLC v. International Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 10, 2015No. 2014-1527Published

1DissentNewman, Circuit Judge

Today’s culture, as well as today’s economy, are founded on advances in science and technology. As the Industrial Revolution advanced, and recognizing the importance to the nation of technology-based industry, the Tariff Acts of 1922 and 1930 were enacted to provide additional support to domestic industries that dealt in new and creative commerce, by providing an efficient safeguard against unfair competition by imports that infringe United States patents or copyrights. The International Trade Commission correctly applied the Tariff Act and precedent to encompass today’s forms of infringing…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API