Legal Opinion

Vandewark v. Widman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 15, 1926No. 11,221PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Allen

This is an action to quiet title to the waters of a spring. Defendant filed a cross-complaint claiming a one-fourth interest in the same. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings the case here.

In 1914 the plaintiff constructed a pipe line across what is now the defendant’s land, connecting the spring with plaintiff’s land, and used the water for household and stockwatering purposes. In 1918 the defendant constructed a pipe line running from his home to the plaintiff’s supply line, and began using some of the water. Plaintiff claims that defendant had a mere license to use the water for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hoehne Ditch Co. v. John Flood Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schust v. PeringtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. Schust v. PeringtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API