Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Stuart v. University of Mississippi Medical Center

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2009No. 2007-CT-00864-SCTPublished

1Concurrence

RANDOLPH, Justice,

Specially Concurring.

¶ 16. Based upon Grimes v. Warrington, 982 So.2d 365, 369-70 (Miss.2008), I agree with the Majority “that UMMC’s participation in this lawsuit and its failure to raise Stuart’s noncompliance with the ninety-day requirement until two-and-a-half years later constitute waiver of that defense.” (Maj. Op. at ¶ 9). I further agree with the Majority that, because the pre-suit notice requirements of Mississippi Code Annotated Section 11-46-11 are waivable, they should not be considered jurisdictional. Finally, I agree with the Majority’s decision to overrule…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Joel G. PACHECO, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald B. RICE, Secretary of Air Force, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. Carr v. Town of ShubutaMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Victoria Pietras v. Board of Fire Commissioners of the Farmingville Fire DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. City of Jackson v. LumpkinMississippi Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API