Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re the Marriage of Bach

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 1992No. 90DM0881; CA A70808Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRiggs, J.

The majority affirms all issues except for recomputation of child support. I agree that child support must be recomputed. However, I do not agree that we should affirm the award of spousal support.

We review de novo, but that does not mean that we should decide the cases willy-nilly. It is true that many, if not most, dissolution cases are fact-specific. Attempts at close factual comparisons are usually of little use, given the almost *226endless variations in the factual matrix and the relative changing priority given to each fact from case to case. Nevertheless, some consistency is possible and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of StuartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. In re the Marriage of BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API