Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel E. Danford
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 18, 2006No. 04-4232, 05-1539PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Daniel E. Danford appeals his convictions on three counts of mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and two counts of interstate transportation of a security taken by fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 2314. Danford argues that the district court abused its discretion in four ways: (1) by denying his motion for mistrial; (2) in admitting evidence under the FRE 803 exception to the hearsay rule; (3) by responding to jurors’ questions during their deliberations; and (4) in calculating restitution. Further, Danford contends that his sentence was unreasonable. We affirm…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Gary R. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. BenabeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Scott AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. John L. Tolliver and Archie Dunklin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. CaraniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. David H. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.