Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Mahoney

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1901No. S.F. No. 2257PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

The decedent left all his estate by will to his ten nephews and nieces, all of whom are non-residents of the state of California, three of them residing in the state of New York and seven in Ireland. Seven of the said nieces and nephews appeal,— 1. From that portion of the decree of final distribution herein which deducts five per cent from their respective distributive shares for collateral inheritance tax, and 2. From that portion of said decree which deducts a further sum of one dollar and ninety cents on each one hundred dollars for taxes claimed to be due on said estate.

1.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spraigue v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People ex rel. Davidson v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People's Advocate, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Mordecai v. Board of Supervisors of County of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. In Re the Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API