(PS) Ortiz v. Enhanced Recovery Company
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RENE ORTIZ, No. 2:17-cv-0607 KJM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the 18 undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending 19 before the court are plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, motion for judgment on the 20 pleadings, motion to “apply laws,” and motion stay, as well as defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Richards v. Nielsen Freight LinesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1985
- Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.