Legal Opinion

Dore v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 1, 1951No. 48682, 48683Published

1Opinion of the Court

97 F.Supp. 239 (1951)

DORE et al.

v.

UNITED STATES.

INTERNATIONAL RICE MILL. CO., Inc.

v.

UNITED STATES.

Nos. 48682, 48683.

United States Court of Claims.

May 1, 1951.

Herman J. Galloway, Washington, D. C., for the plaintiffs. Paul M. Rhodes and King & King, Washington, were on the briefs.

John J. McGinty, with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. H. G. Morison, for the defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and HOWELL, Judges.

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiffs were millers of rice during the period of commodity price control during World War II. In these suits they seek to recover just…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API