Foot v. Edwards
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
INGERSOLL, District Judge.
It appears, by the plaintiffs' declaration, that they are the owners of mill, property in the state of Massachusetts, situate not far from the dividing line between that state and the state of Connecticut, on a stream of water which is accustomed to flow from, and has its rise in, the latter state; that, in Connecticut, the defendant diverted the water of the stream, by which diversion it ceased to flow to the plaintiffs’ mill; and that, in consequence thereof, the value of the plaintiffs’ mill, so situate in Massachusetts, was greatly impaired.
The right of recovery…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Watts' Administrators v. KinneyNew York Supreme Court · 1840
3Cited by10 opinions
- Willey v. DeckerWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
- Lakeside Irrigation Co. v. Markham Irrigation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
- Bean v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Deseret Irrigation Co. v. McIntyreUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- White v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.