Legal Opinion

United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Wyoming Excise Tax Division, Department of Revenue & Taxation

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1986No. 85-15PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

The trial court entered judgment for unpaid Wyoming sales and use taxes against the surety of a nonresident prime contractor performing work in Yellowstone National Park under a contract with the United States government. We will affirm.

Bernal Construction Company (Bernal), a nonresident prime contractor, was awarded a contract to build a water system in Yellowstone National Park. Appellant United Pacific Insurance Company (United Pacific) agreed to become Bernal’s surety on Miller Act bonds (40 U.S.C. § 270a).1 The Wyo*219ming Excise Tax Division determined that Bernal was…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. United States v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. CrispSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. First National Bank of Steamboat Springs, N.A.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Alvarez v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
  3. Ray v. St. Vincent Healthcare, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Sublette County School District No. 1 v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API