Waldo v. . Wilson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
PbtitioN to rehear the above entitled case, reported 173 N. C., p. 689.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
"When this appeal was first before this Court we said that the plaintiffs make two contentions:
1. That the grant under which defendant claims is void.
2. That plaintiffs have been in adverse possession under color for seven years prior to the commencement of the action.
We adhere to our former opinion upon the first contention, for the reasons and upon tbe authorities therein given.
We are, however, of opinion, upon a careful reexamination of the record, that our conclusion reached upon the review of the second contention is erroneous. We were advertent to errors in the charge upon this branch…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christman v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Bryan v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- McLean v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Hamilton v. . IcardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Osborne v. . JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alexander v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Alexander v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Raines v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Williamson v. VannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979