Lewis v. Rowland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
To render vehicles visible to travelers on the highways at night, in order that the public may use the highways in safety, is the purpose of the statute requiring front and rear hghts on vehicles. In any specific instance, the attainment of visibility in time to prevent disaster meets the demand of the law.
The nonsuit in this case was on the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The testimony most favorable to plaintiff authorizes the conclusion that defendant’s truck and trailer were standing still on the traveled highway before and at the time of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Ward v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Quinn v. O'KeeffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Henry E. Fox Construction Co. v. Dailey's Towing Line, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- Noth v. ScheurerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Anderson v. CalkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937