Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Internal Revenue Service of United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 10, 1998No. 96-3166, 96-3215PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Thomas Bridges and his associated companies are in debt to three parties: the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), the State of Kansas, and a group of private judgment-creditors, the “Floyd plaintiffs.” These three parties sought judicial resolution of the priority of their claims to the assets of Bridges and his companies. Following a bench trial, the District Court for the District of Kansas held that the IRS claims primed those of the other two parties, and that, as to the remaining assets, Kansas took priority over the Floyd plaintiffs. The district court’s holding was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Manufacturers Consolidation Service, Inc. v. RodellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. LFC Marketing Group, Inc. v. LoomisNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re PhillipsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. C.F. Trust, Inc. v. First Flight Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  5. Baillie Lumber Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API