Legal Opinion

Teresi v. Filley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1946No. 32018PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This, so far as the parties here are concerned, is a foreclosure action against the mortgagors and a judgment creditor of the mortgagors. The trial court held the mortgage to be without consideration and void and enforced the judgment. The plaintiff appeals. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The parties defendant originally were Edith Beckman, who was dismissed from the case on plaintiff’s motion at the time of trial; Samuel Mancuso and Mary Mancuso, mortgagors; Rose Filley, a judgment creditor of the defendant, Samuel Mancuso; and Conservative Savings and Loan Association. This last…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leon v. Kitchen Bros. Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Morris v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Jennings v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Filley v. MancusoNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Omaha v. First Cadco Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Lingenfelter v. Lower Elkhorn NRDNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Schluter v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Wyoming Wool Marketing Ass'n v. WoodruffWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Klein v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API