Legal Opinion
Dunn v. Southall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 3, 1962No. 39638PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
Laurissa Southall, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced an action against Sarah Dunn and Horace W. Oates for damages allegedly sustained as a result of an automobile collision. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff and judgment was rendered thereon. After a motion for a new trial was overruled, defendants, Dunn and Oates perfected this appeal.
Inasmuch as the contentions of the defendants do not relate to the cause of the accident, the facts surrounding the accident are immaterial and will not be discussed.
PROPOSITION I
Defendants contend that the medical…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. EpplerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Enid City Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Jordan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Hasty Messenger Service v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Milsap v. KahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- JC Penney Company v. BarrientezSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. SouthallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Reece v. PletcherCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992