Legal Opinion

Pine Bluff Heading Co. v. Bock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 17, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellee, the plaintiff below, lives at Roe, Arkansas, and in 1920 was engaged in operating a gin and sawmill at that place. ' Appellant, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the compány, is engaged in the • manufacture of heading, with its principal place of business in Pine Bluff, and with a branch plant' at Brinkley, which is operated under the name of the Brinkley Heading Company. • ■ ■

'It is the contention of appellee that in August,' 1920, the appellant, through its agent, Joe Plyler, entered’into a verbal contract with him whereby he was to purchase for the company certain heading…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arkmo Lumber Co. v. CantrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  2. United States Bedding Co. v. AndesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Concordia Fire Insurance v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. DeCamp v. GraupnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Clifton v. RossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McGill v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ArbogastWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Oil City Iron Works v. BradleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  4. American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. BondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Boddy v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API