Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided August 26, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

Honorable John Hannah Office of the Secretary of State Executive Division State of Texas P. O. Box 12697 Austin, Texas 78711-2697

Re: Whether a health spa exempted from the security deposit requirement by the 1985 version of the Health Spa Act is exempt under the 1989 revision of the act and related questions (RQ-306)

Dear Mr. Hannah:

Your question concerns the security deposits that health-spa owners must file under article 5221l, V.T.C.S., the Health Spa Act. In particular, you wish to know whether any health spas are exempted from the security-deposit requirement.

Article 5221l, V.T.C.S.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BradyTexas Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API