Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Ellis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1914No. 11390PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered February 28, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for a divorce.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Appeal from a divorce decree. The only error assigned is insufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment. We shall make no attempt to set forth the evidence. It can be summed up in a remark made by the trial court just before its conclusion: “There is nothing in this case but a property row.” The lower court, however, concluded that it was best for the parties to separate, and that there was no possibility of their again living together. But, while so believing, the evidence did not impress the court with an opinion that the fault was with either party sufficiently to entitle the other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Weinberg v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Branscheid v. BranscheidWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. McDougall v. McDougallWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Wheeler v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Malloy v. DrumhellerWashington Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnsen v. JohnsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. McMillan v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hilleware v. HillewareWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Motley v. MotleyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Turner v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API