Legal Opinion

Harry Trotz and Camille Trotz v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1966No. 8161PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

Petitioners, husband and wife, seek review of a Tax Court decision 1 affirming the Commissioner’s assessment of an income tax deficiency for the tax years 1958 and 1959. The issue is whether a gain on an instalment sale of depreciable property by taxpayer to Trotz Construction, Inc., is taxable as a long-term capital gain. Section 1239 of the Internal Revenue Code of 19542 provides that gain on the sale of depreciable property by an individual to a corporation “more than 80 percent in value of the outstanding stock of which is owned by such individual, his spouse,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Calvin D. Mitchell and Fay Bond Mitchell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  2. Trotz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  3. United States v. S. L. Rothenberg and Helen RothenbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Curtis L. Parker and Martha ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Yamamoto v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  3. First Chicago Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
  4. Hudlow v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  5. Harold P. Dahlgren v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API