Legal Opinion

Hearn v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2002No. 2000-SC-0865-DGPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*433WINTERSHEIMER, Justice.

This appeal is from a decision of the Court of Appeals which reversed and remanded an order of the circuit court which had denied the motion of the Commonwealth to charge interest on court-ordered restitution in a criminal case.

The sole issue is whether the trial courts of Kentucky have the authority to order post-judgment interest to be paid on the principal amount of restitution until the amount is paid in full under KRS 533.030(3).

James and Patricia Hearn pled guilty to twelve counts of theft by failure to make required disposition of property received in violation…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. Louis RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Jerry D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Bob Hook Chevrolet Isuzu, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Transportation CabinetKentucky Supreme Court · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Shawnee Telecom Resources, Inc. v. BrownKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Maynes v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bowling v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. TappKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Davis v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API