Arlington Seating Co. v. New Philadelphia School District

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Schaefer,

Plaintiff recovered a judgment in the court below against defendant school district in the sum of $3,350 for the purchase price of goods sold and delivered to it. The judgment not being paid, a mandamus execution was issued and became absolute. When this did not bring about payment, a rule was issued to show cause why the directors of the school district and its treasurer should not be adjudged in contempt. The rule was discharged. From this action plaintiff appeals.

The proceeding was brought under the Act of May 18, 1911, P. L. 309, article V, section 514, 24…