Legal Opinion

Avant v. Avant

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 27, 1922No. 5 Div. 817PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellees recovered a judgment against appellant for the statutory penalty provided by section 4S9S of the Code of 1907 for the failure to mark “satisfied” the record of a certain mortgage executed by them to the appellant, bearing date May 2, 1916, and which was duly recorded. It is well established by our decisions that the foregoing statute, being highly penal in its nature, is to be strictly construed, and to authorize a recovery thereunder the complaining party must bring himself within its letter. Wilkerson v. Sorsby, 201 Ala. 182, 77 South. 708.

The notice to the mortgagee demanding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. McGuireSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Wilkerson v. SorsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Home Protection v. WhiddenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Chattanooga National Building & Loan Ass'n v. EcholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. Henderson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API