Legal Opinion

Samaluk v. DeMartis

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 9, 2000Published

1Opinion of the CourtRutberg, J.

This is an expedited appeal from the allowance of defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a motor vehicle tort case. Defendant’s motion is grounded in his assertion that plaintiff could not prove that defendant’s putative negligence was the primary cause of the collision which underlies this action. The trial judge concurred with this assertion1 Summary judgment is rarely granted in *47negligence actions, as courts traditionally defer to a jury’s “unique competence in applying the reasonable man standard to a given fact situation.” Foley v. Matulewicz, 17 Mass. App. Ct. 1004, 1005 (1984);…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Foley v. MatulewiczMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  3. Delk v. GonzalezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. O'Connor v. HickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Wright v. SabatinoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API