State v. Whitcomb
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This appeal is from a conviction for speeding and from an order issuing a bench warrant for arrest on a charge of obstructing legal process. 1 Appellant Tony Whit-comb had notice of the trial on both charges but did not appear. A conviction was ordered on the speeding charge and a bench warrant issued for his arrest for obstructing legal process. Whitcomb claims the trial court should not have taken these actions because there was a stay of execution of sentence pending his appeal of a contempt conviction. The state replies that the stay pertained only to the contempt…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State v. FagerstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- State v. ConawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. HuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. HattonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. LaDoucerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991