Legal Opinion

State v. Whitcomb

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 20, 1987No. C3-87-1148PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for speeding and from an order issuing a bench warrant for arrest on a charge of obstructing legal process. 1 Appellant Tony Whit-comb had notice of the trial on both charges but did not appear. A conviction was ordered on the speeding charge and a bench warrant issued for his arrest for obstructing legal process. Whitcomb claims the trial court should not have taken these actions because there was a stay of execution of sentence pending his appeal of a contempt conviction. The state replies that the stay pertained only to the contempt…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. State v. FagerstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. State v. ConawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. HuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. State v. HattonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. LaDoucerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API