Harrod v. New Orleans Sewerage Co.

*1596On Motion to Dismiss.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Watkins, J.

This appeal is prosecuted by a third person who was not originally a party to the suit, but a stockholder of the corporation, and the decree that is appealed from is an interlocutory judgment appointing a receiver of a corporation.

The appellees move to dismiss the appeal on several grounds, viz.:

First — That the return day was fixed by the appellant and same was illegal, because fifteen days interval for citation and answer were not allowed in conformity to the requirements of Act No. 6 of 1896.

Second — That proper…